
Over the past two decades, large enterprises have invested substantially in supply chain planning systems. Platforms such as Kinaxis, SAP ABP, Blue Yonder, o9, Anaplan, Logility, and others now serve as deeply embedded systems of record across complex global networks.
In many cases, those investments delivered meaningful early gains. Organizations improved visibility, strengthened cross-functional coordination, and introduced greater analytical discipline into planning decisions.
Yet across industries, a quieter pattern is emerging.
Performance improvements are becoming harder to sustain. Service levels stabilize rather than climb, and capacity utilization plateaus. Inventory buffers expand defensively. Planning teams spend increasing time managing exceptions rather than systematically improving outcomes.
The systems are not broken; new value delivery and ROI has stalled.
This plateau is not the result of poor implementation. It reflects a structural limitation of deterministic planning models operating in environments now defined by persistent volatility and continuous change.
Historically, organizations have addressed this ceiling by replacing outdated systems. When gains slowed, they launched multi-year transformation programs, selected new vendors, and restarted implementation cycles.
Today, that response is increasingly misaligned with executive priorities. Existing planning systems are operationally critical, costly to replace, and deeply integrated. Replacing them introduces financial risk, organizational disruption, and extended timelines precisely when agility is most needed.
The more relevant question is no longer which system to replace; it is about extending the decision-making capability, value delivery and ROI of the systems already in place.

Most traditional supply chain planning systems operate on a cyclical logic: collect inputs, run the model, generate a feasible plan, manually adjust between cycles, and repeat weekly or monthly.
That model assumed volatility was episodic. Today, volatility is continuous.
Tariffs shift mid-quarter, supplier constraints emerge unexpectedly, promotions distort demand patterns, transportation lanes tighten and customer expectations compress fulfillment windows.
Between planning runs, minor deviations accumulate. Planners intervene manually. Spreadsheets reappear. Incremental adjustments add complexity without fundamentally improving performance.
Even advanced scenario capabilities often require planners to define a limited number of “what-if” alternatives, run them sequentially, and manually compare results. Exploration remains narrow and labor-intensive.
As variability increases, the economics of this approach deteriorate. Deterministic models struggle to explore enough alternatives quickly enough to uncover materially better outcomes consistently.
The result is a performance plateau, not because the system fails, but because it cannot continuously experiment at the scale modern volatility demands.
ketteQ Intelligent Digital Agents were designed to address this structural limitation, not by replacing systems of record, but by augmenting them.
Powered by the patent-pending PolymatiQ™ agentic AI engine, these agents operate continuously across demand, supply, inventory, revenue, and customer commitments.
Rather than producing a single plan and waiting for the next cycle, agents:
In practical terms, they perform the analytical work of thousands of planners in parallel.
This is not a conversational overlay. It is a domain-specific, multi-constraint optimization embedded directly into supply chain decision-making.
Planning shifts from periodic recalculation to continuous experimentation.

Recent advances in generative AI have introduced copilots into enterprise workflows. These tools are highly effective at summarizing data, answering questions, and generating narrative insights.
Supply chain planning, however, is not primarily a language problem. It is a constrained optimization problem.
Consider a planner evaluating whether to increase safety stock for a specific SKU.
A conversational AI tool might recommend a percentage adjustment based on historical volatility.
A PolymatiQ™-powered Intelligent Digital Agent evaluates demand variability, lead-time uncertainty, service targets, material constraints, production capacity, stockout penalties, and financial objectives simultaneously. It runs thousands of structured variations against the same constraints already embedded in the system. It calculates the optimal level within approved policies, and if authorized, executes the adjustment automatically.
Agents do not describe decisions, they generate and operationalize them. That distinction is architectural.
The impact of augmentation is best understood through observed results.
Partner in Pet Food (PPF), one of Europe’s largest pet food manufacturers, operates 12 production facilities across 10 countries and relies on Kinaxis as its supply chain planning system of record.
After years of optimization, performance improvements had stalled. The system was stable and deeply embedded, but incremental gains were increasingly difficult to achieve.
PPF did not replace its planning platform. Instead, it augmented Kinaxis with PolymatiQ™-powered Intelligent Digital Agents running directly on top of the existing environment.
Within the first planning cycle at the initial plant:
These results were achieved in approximately four to six weeks with:
No system replacement.
No multi-year transformation.
No disruption to the system of record.
The plateau was not permanent. It required a different form of intelligence layered on top of existing infrastructure.

Organizations adopting agent-led planning are not choosing between different technologies. They are deciding how broadly to deploy the same intelligence.
ketteQ Intelligent Digital Agents can be deployed in two ways.
1. Augment Existing Planning Systems
Agents run on top of platforms such as SAP APO and IBP, Oracle, Kinaxis, Blue Yonder, o9, Logility, and Anaplan. They connect to existing models and constraints, apply probabilistic multi-scenario analysis, and surface improved decisions within familiar workflows.
This path delivers measurable operational and financial improvements in as little as four to eight weeks, without disrupting systems of record.
2. Operate Natively Within ketteQ’s End-to-End Adaptive Planning Platform
The same agents, powered by the same PolymatiQ™ engine, can operate within ketteQ’s adaptive planning architecture for organizations seeking broader modernization or architectural simplification.
The intelligence does not change. Only the scope of deployment does.
As Mike Landry, CEO of ketteQ, explains:
“Supply chain volatility is no longer an exception; it’s the operating reality. Our Intelligent Digital Agents give companies a practical choice. They can rapidly enhance their existing planning systems and see results in weeks, or they can move to ketteQ’s adaptive end-to-end planning platform. In both cases, PolymatiQ-powered agents continuously sense change, evaluate possibilities, and turn planning into an always-on strategic capability.”
This distinction reframes modernization. The choice is no longer between maintaining the status quo and restarting the clock. Organizations can extend performance immediately while preserving future options.
Most enterprises do not need another system implementation.
They need a way to break through the structural ceiling of deterministic planning.
Augmentation with Intelligent Digital Agents offers that path. It unlocks measurable financial and operational gains in weeks rather than years, while preserving prior investments and reducing execution risk.
The planning plateau is real, but it is not permanent.
Visit the ketteQ Intelligent Digital Agents page and learn how PolymatiQ™-powered Intelligent Digital Agents can augment your existing planning system and unlock measurable results in weeks.